MCDM Methods for Selection of Handling Equipment in Logistics: A Brief Review

Authors

  • Alma Jusufbašić Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Doboj, University of East Sarajevo, Vojvode Mišića 52, 74000 Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/sems1120232j

Keywords:

MCDM methods; Handling equipment; Logistics

Abstract

This review considers the application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in the evaluation process of handling equipment in logistics. In order to present a current review of research papers, 21 articles, published in the period from 2010 to date, were analyzed. All research papers were searched using the Google scholar web search engine. This paper presents various MCDM methods used to select equipment such as forklifts, cranes, conveyors, AGVs (automatically guided vehicles), AMRs (autonomous mobile robots), reach stackers both in warehouses, ports, city logistics and in intermodal transport. The results of research papers published in various journals related to the application of MCDM methods including AHP, MABAC, SWARA, ARAS, FUCOM, CRITIC, MARCOS and various fuzzy methods were also analyzed. As the studies analyzed in the paper has been published from 2010 to the present, this indicates the importance and relevance of this area of research. The purpose of this paper is to encourage additional research in this area and to provide a brief summary of the most recent studies in this field. The results of the paper showed that the most used handling equipment was the conveyor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.

Krstić, M., Tadić, S., Brnjac, N., & Zečević, S. (2019). Intermodal terminal handling equipment selection using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 31(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v31i1.2949.

Dalalah, D., Al-Oqla, F., & Hayajneh, M. (2010). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of cranes. Jordan Journal of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, 4(5).

Stoilova, S. D., & Martinov, S. V. (2019). Choosing the container handling equipment in a rail-road intermodal terminal through multi-criteria methods. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 664(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/664/1/012032.

Krstić, M., Tadić, S., Elia, V., Massari, S., & Farooq, M. U. (2023). Intermodal Terminal Subsystem Technology Selection Using Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model. Sustainability, 15(4), 3427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043427.

Vesković, S., Stević, Ž., Nunić, Z., Milinković, S., & Mladenović, D. (2022). A novel integrated large-scale group MCDM model under fuzzy environment for selection of reach stacker in a container terminal. Applied Intelligence, 52(12), 13543-13567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02914-1.

Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašić, A., & Stević, Ž. (2019). FUCOM method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901065f.

Chakraborty, S., & Saha, A. K. (2022). Selection of Forklift unit for transport handling using integrated MCDM under neutrosophic environment. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220620039C.

Kučera, T. (2020). Selection of Handling Equipment in Warehouse Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. In Transport Means 2020: Proceedings of the 24th International Scientific Conference. Kaunas University of Technology.

Huskanović, E., & Stević, Z. (2022). Forklift Selection Using an Integrated Criticmarcos Model. In 5th Logistics International Conference, Belgrade, Serbia.

Tuzkaya, G., Gülsün, B., Kahraman, C., & Özgen, D. (2010). An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2853-2863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.004.

Voćkić, M., Stojić, G., & Stević, B. (2018). Integrated rough SWARA-ARAS model for selection of electric forklift. In ICMNEE 2018 The 2nd International Conference on Management, Engineering and Environment (Vol. 216, p. 227).

Tadić, S., Krstić, M., Dabić-Miletić, S., & Božić, M. (2023). Smart Material Handling Solutions for City Logistics Systems. Sustainability, 15(8), 6693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086693.

Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057.

Nguyen, H. T., Md Dawal, S. Z., Nukman, Y., P. Rifai, A., & Aoyama, H. (2016). An integrated MCDM model for conveyor equipment evaluation and selection in an FMC based on a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ARAS in the presence of vagueness. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0153222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153222.

Yazdani-Chamzini, A. (2014). An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making model for handling equipment selection. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(5), 660-673. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802714.

Mathew, M., & Sahu, S. (2018). Comparison of new multi-criteria decision making methods for material handling equipment selection. Management Science Letters, 8(3), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.1.004.

Mousavi, S. M., Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Tajik, N. (2014). Soft computing based on a fuzzy grey group compromise solution approach with an application to the selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 27(6), 547-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2013.834460.

Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Mohamadghasemi, A. (2015). A new hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for solving the material handling equipment selection problem. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(5), 534-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2014.880948.

Chatterjee, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). Application of the R method in solving material handling equipment selection problems. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame622023391.

Büyüközkan, G., Arsenyan, J., & Ruan, D. (2012). Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.017.

Horňáková, N., Jurík, L., Hrablik Chovanová, H., Cagáňová, D., & Babčanová, D. (2021). AHP method application in selection of appropriate material handling equipment in selected industrial enterprise. Wireless Networks, 27(3), 1683-1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02050-2.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-28

How to Cite

Jusufbašić, A. (2023). MCDM Methods for Selection of Handling Equipment in Logistics: A Brief Review. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems1120232j

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3