Risk Prioritization from the Crowd-Shipping Provider's Perspective using the CIMAS Method

Authors

  • Libor Švadlenka University of Pardubice, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Department of Transport Management, Marketing, and Logistics, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-6660
  • Patricija Bajec University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies, 6320 Portorose, Slovenia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1511-1064
  • Halyna Pivtorak (*) University of Pardubice, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Department of Transport Management, Marketing, and Logistics, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic (**) Lviv National Polytechnic University, Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Transport, Department of Transport Technologies, 79013, Lviv, Ukraine Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-1586
  • Sara Bošković University of Pardubice, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Department of Transport Management, Marketing, and Logistics, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-4262
  • Stefan Jovčić University of Pardubice, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Department of Transport Management, Marketing, and Logistics, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-2133
  • Momčilo Dobrodolac University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-8329

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/sems21202430s

Keywords:

MCDM, CIMAS, BWM, Risk Assessment, Crowdshipping

Abstract

Crowd-shipping presents a new trend in shipment distribution. It is a process in which the crowd is employed to deliver the items. Effective risk prioritization is essential in city logistics and delivery, especially with the emergence of crowd-shipping. As crowd-shipping platforms grow, they bring uncertainties and challenges that can significantly impact operational efficiency and customer confidence. Emphasizing risk prioritization is crucial for many reasons, including trust and security, improving operational efficiency, and ensuring regulatory readiness. Risk prioritization is more than a mere formality; it is a vital element in successfully managing the intricacies of crowd-shipping. By methodically addressing and mitigating risks, providers can strengthen their operational capabilities, foster better customer connections, and ultimately promote the sustainable advancement of crowd-shipping services. This paper prioritizes the risks in crowd-shipping from the crowd-shipping provider’s perspective, using an MCDM approach such as CIMAS. The risks are prioritized in descending order. Comparative analysis with the BWM indicates the high reliability of the results obtained by the CIMAS method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tang, E. K. K. (2023). Enhancing data protection and parcel security in crowd-shipping platforms: user perspectives and system ramifications. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Pourrahmani, E., & Jaller, M. (2021). Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78, 101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101063.

Tapia, R.J., de Jong, G., Larranaga, A.M., & Bettella Cybis, H.B. (2021). Exploring Multiple-discreteness in Freight Transport. A Multiple Discrete Extreme Value Model Application for Grain Consolidators in Argentina. Networks and Spatial Economics 21(3), 581-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-021-09531-y.

Yıldız, B. (2021). Package routing problem with registered couriers and stochastic demand. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 147, 102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102248.

Mohri, S. S., Ghaderi, H., Nassir, N., & Thompson, R. G. (2023). Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 178, 103289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103289.

Nascimento, C. D. O. L., Gatta, V., & Marcucci, E. (2023). Green Crowdshipping: Critical factors from a business perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 51, 101062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101062.

Samad, T. A., Ganguly, K. K., & Das, D. (2023). Towards a framework for development of Crowd Logistics: Paving the way for sustainable logistics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 176, 109008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109008.

Le, T. V., Stathopoulos, A., Van Woensel, T., & Ukkusuri, S. V. (2019). Supply, demand, operations, and management of crowd-shipping services: A review and empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 103, 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.023.

Strulak-Wójcikiewicz, R., & Wagner, N. (2021). Exploring opportunities of using the sharing economy in sustainable urban freight transport. Sustainable Cities and Society, 68, 102778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102778.

Ermagun, A., & Stathopoulos, A. (2021). Crowd-shipping delivery performance from bidding to delivering. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 41, 100614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100614.

Biswas, A., Gazi, K. H., & Mondal, S. P. (2024). Finding Effective Factor for Circular Economy Using Uncertain MCDM Approach. Management Science Advances, 1(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.31181/msa1120245.

Frehe, V., Mehmann, J., & Teuteberg, F. (2017). Understanding and assessing crowd logistics business models – using everyday people for last mile delivery. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2015-0182.

Huang, L., Xie, G., Blenkinsopp, J., Huang, R., & Bin, H. (2020). Crowdsourcing for sustainable urban logistics: Exploring the factors influencing crowd workers’ participative behavior. Sustainability, 12(8), 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083091.

Ulmer, M. W., & Savelsbergh, M. (2020). Workforce scheduling in the era of crowdsourced delivery. Transportation Science, 54(4), 1113-1133. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2020.0977.

Punel, A., & Stathopoulos, A. (2017). Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 105, 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.06.007.

Marcucci, E., Le Pira, M., Carrocci, C. S., Gatta, V., & Pieralice, E. (2017). Connected shared mobility for passengers and freight: Investigating the potential of crowdshipping in urban areas. In 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (pp. 839-843). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2017.8005629.

Behrend, M., & Meisel, F. (2018). The integration of item-sharing and crowdshipping: Can collaborative consumption be pushed by delivering through the crowd? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.017.

Gatta, V., Marcucci, E., Nigro, M., Patella, S. M., & Serafini, S. (2018). Public transport-based crowdshipping for sustainable city logistics: Assessing economic and environmental impacts. Sustainability, 11(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010145.

Rai, H. B., Verlinde, S., & Macharis, C. (2018). Shipping outside the box. Environmental impact and stakeholder analysis of a crowd logistics platform in Belgium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 806-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.210.

Allahviranloo, M., & Baghestani, A. (2019). A dynamic crowdshipping model and daily travel behavior. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 128, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.06.002.

Shen, H., & Lin, J. (2020). Investigation of crowdshipping delivery trip production with real-world data. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 143, 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102106.

Dai, Q., Jia, H., & Liu, Y. (2020). Private vehicle-based crowdshipping for intercity express transportation: Feasibility assessment. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147720908203.

Lin, X., Nishiki, Y., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2020). Performance and intrusiveness of crowdshipping systems: An experiment with commuting cyclists in The Netherlands. Sustainability, 12(17), 7208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177208.

Simoni, M. D., Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., & Claudel, C. G. (2020). Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: a simulation-based evaluation. Transportation, 47, 1933-1954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10028-4.

Ahamed, T., Zou, B., Farazi, N. P., & Tulabandhula, T. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning for crowdsourced urban delivery. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 152, 227-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.08.015.

Behrend, M. (2021). Operations Management in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Perspective of Item-Sharing and Crowdshipping. In International Conference on Operations Research (pp. 3-8). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08623-6_1.

Triki, C. (2021). Using combinatorial auctions for the procurement of occasional drivers in the freight transportation: A case-study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, 127057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127057.

Boysen, N., Emde, S., & Schwerdfeger, S. (2022). Crowdshipping by employees of distribution centers: Optimization approaches for matching supply and demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 296(2), 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.002.

Ghaderi, H., Tsai, P. W., Zhang, L., & Moayedikia, A. (2022). An integrated crowdshipping framework for green last-mile delivery. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78, 103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103552.

Wicaksono, S., Lin, X., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2022). Market potential of bicycle crowdshipping: A two-sided acceptance analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100660.

Cebeci, M. S., Tapia, R. J., Kroesen, M., de Bok, M., & Tavasszy, L. (2023). The effect of trust on the choice for crowdshipping services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103622.

Tsai, P. W., Xue, X., & Zhang, J. (2023). Trajectory feature extraction and multi‐criteria k nearest neighbor based job‐to‐crowd matching for the crowdshipping last mile delivery. IET Control Theory & Applications, 17(17), 2304-2312. https://doi.org/10.1049/cth2.12489.

Akbar, U., Jain, A. A., & Bråthen, S. (2024). Sustainability assessment of inter-urban crowdshipping-A case study approach. Research in Transportation Economics, 103, 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101409.

Cheng, R., Fessler, A., Nielsen, O. A., Larsen, A., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Assessing the potential impacts of public transport-based crowdshipping: A case study in a central district of Copenhagen. Frontiers of Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-4019-5.

Fessler, A., Haustein, S., & Thorhauge, M. (2024). Drivers and barriers in adopting a crowdshipping service: A mixed-method approach based on an extended theory of planned behaviour. Travel Behaviour and Society, 35, 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100747.

Hwang, F. J., Hu, B., & Kovalyov, M. Y. (2024). Supermarket-chain grocery delivery optimization through crowdshipping. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2389550.

Macrina, G., Archetti, C., & Guerriero, F. (2024). Bundles generation and pricing in crowdshipping. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 13, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtl.2024.100142.

Şardağ, A., Kızıl, K. U., & Yıldız, B. (2024). Crowdshipping problem with dynamic compensations and transshipments. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 166, 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104796.

Sawik, B. (2024). Optimizing Last-Mile Delivery: A Multi-Criteria Approach with Automated Smart Lockers, Capillary Distribution and Crowdshipping. Logistics, 8(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8020052.

Shen, H., & Lin, J. (2024). A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a real-world crowdshipping service with observed sender-courier preference discrepancy. Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10528-y.

Xiang, C., Wu, Z., Tu, J., & Huang, J. (2024). Centralized Deep Reinforcement Learning Method for Dynamic Multi-Vehicle Pickup and Delivery Problem With Crowdshippers. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(8), 9253-9267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3352143.

Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simic, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., & Bacanin, N. (2023). A new criteria importance assessment (Cimas) method in multi-criteria group decision-making: Criteria evaluation for supplier selection. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230730050B.

Allahbakhsh, M., Benatallah, B., Ignjatovic, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H. R., Bertino, E., & Dustdar, S. (2013). Quality control in crowdsourcing systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(2), 76-81. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/MIC.2013.20.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Švadlenka, L., Bajec, P., Pivtorak, H., Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., & Dobrodolac, M. (2024). Risk Prioritization from the Crowd-Shipping Provider’s Perspective using the CIMAS Method. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 2(1), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems21202430s

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3