Interval-value Pythagorean Fuzzy Prioritized Aggregation Operators for Selecting an Eco-Friendly Transportation Mode Selection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/sems21202422gKeywords:
Interval-value Pythagorean Fuzzy Set, Group Decision-Making, Prioritized Aggregation Operators, Eco-Friendly Transportation ModeAbstract
When selecting an environmentally friendly mode of transportation, many factors must be taken into account, such as capacity, delivery time, cost-effectiveness, and environmental impact. This is a difficult decision-making problem since it calls for the simultaneous evaluation and prioritization of several criteria. A thorough and methodical approach is required to make an informed decision that satisfies particular transportation needs while adhering to sustainability goals. The process entails balancing various trade-offs to determine the most environmentally friendly mode of transportation. When solving multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, prioritization is essential. Prioritization in fuzzy systems has been implemented through a variety of techniques and approaches. This paper tackles the MAGDM problem within the Pythagorean fuzzy (PyF) framework, taking into account the different requirements for experts and characteristics. We present new Aczel Alsina aggregation operators (AOs), whose efficient handling of uncertainties makes a major contribution to fuzzy mathematics. We suggest several PyF AOs, such as the PyF-prioritized Aczel Alsina geometric (PyFPAAG) and PyF-prioritized Aczel Alsina averaging (PyFPAAA), which are based on the Aczel Alsina t-norm and t-conorm. We show these AOs satisfy the aggregation criteria by examining their monotonicity, boundedness, and idempotency properties. The prioritization weights are derived from expert knowledge, enabling the suggested operators to capture the prioritization phenomenon among the aggregated arguments. Using a MAGDM technique, the proposed AOs are used to evaluate eco-friendly transportation modes. Their significance is confirmed by contrasting them with other well-known AOs.
Downloads
References
Ku, D., Kim, J., Yu, Y., Kim, S., Lee, S., & Lee, S. (2021). Assessment of eco-friendly effects on green transportation demand management. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 89, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2189021.
Ajay, P., Nagaraj, B., Pillai, B. M., Suthakorn, J., & Bradha, M. (2022). Intelligent ecofriendly transport management system based on IoT in urban areas. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02010-x.
Kuzey, C., Fritz, M. M., Uyar, A., & Karaman, A. S. (2022). Board gender diversity, CSR strategy, and eco-friendly initiatives in the transportation and logistics sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 108436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108436.
Alshamrani, A., Sengupta, D., Das, A., Bera, U. K., Hezam, I. M., Nayeem, M. K., & Aqlan, F. (2023). Optimal Design of an Eco-Friendly Transportation Network under Uncertain Parameters. Sustainability, 15(6), 5538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065538.
Ku, D., Kweon, S., Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2022). Wider Benefits of Eco-Friendly Transportation Projects with Contingent Valuation Method. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 97, 133-138. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2297023.
Bencekri, M., Ku, D., Kwak, J., Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Review of eco-friendly guidance of transport infrastructure: Korea and the world. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 89, 235-240. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2189040.
Gao, H. L., Zhang, M. Q., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Exploring the alternative modes of eco-friendly express freight transport. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, 17(4), 8805-8816. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_88058816.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
Yager, R. R. (2013). Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), pp. 57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375.
Yager, R. R., & Abbasov, A. M. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(5), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21584.
Yager, R. R. (2014). Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958-965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989.
Senapati, T., Chen, G., & Yager, R. R. (2022). Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators and their application to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(2), 1529-1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22684.
Khan, M. R., Wang, H., Ullah, K., & Karamti, H. (2022). Construction material selection by using multi-attribute decision making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8537. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178537.
Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Yang, M. S., & Pamucar, D. (2022). Aczel-Alsina aggregation operators on T-spherical fuzzy (TSF) information with application to TSF multi-attribute decision making. IEEE Access, 10, 26011-26023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3156764.
Senapati, T. (2022). Approaches to multi-attribute decision making based on picture fuzzy Aczel-Alsina average aggregation operators. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 41(40), 1-28.
Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., & Yager, R. R. (2022). Novel Aczel–Alsina operations‐based interval‐valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multiple attribute decision‐making process. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(8), 5059-5081. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22751.
Farahbod, F., & Eftekhari, M. (2012). Comparison of different T-norm operators in classification problems. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems, 2(3), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijfls.2012.2303.
Yager, R. R. (2008). Prioritized aggregation operators. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 48(1), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.08.009.
Yan, H. B., Huynh, V. N., Nakamori, Y., & Murai, T. (2011). On prioritized weighted aggregation in multi-criteria decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 812-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.039.
Yu, X., & Xu, Z. (2013). Prioritized intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. Information Fusion, 14(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2012.01.011.
Arora, R., & Garg, H. (2019). Group decision-making method based on prioritized linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and its fundamental properties. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 38, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0764-1.
Ali, Z., Mahmood, T., Aslam, M., & Chinram, R. (2021). Another view of complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based on prioritized aggregation operators and their applications to multiattribute decision making. Mathematics, 9(16), 1922. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161922.
Gao, H. (2018). Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(2), 2229-2245. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172262.
Chen, T. Y. (2014). A prioritized aggregation operator-based approach to multiple criteria decision making using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: A comparative perspective. Information Sciences, 281, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.018.
Jana, C., Pal, M., & Wang, J. Q. (2020). Bipolar fuzzy Dombi prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Soft Computing, 24, 3631-3646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04130-z.
Riaz, M., Pamucar, D., Athar Farid, H. M., & Hashmi, M. R. (2020). q-Rung orthopair fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators and their application towards green supplier chain management. Symmetry, 12(6), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060976.
Wang, Z., Li, K. W., & Wang, W. (2009). An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights. Information Sciences, 179(17), 3026-3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.05.001.
Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., & Yager, R. R. (2023). Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators in the framework of Aczel-Alsina triangular norms and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 212, 118832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118832.
Sarfraz, M., Ullah, K., Akram, M., Pamucar, D., & Božanić, D. (2022). Prioritized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy information based on Aczel–Alsina T-norm and T-conorm and their applications in group decision-making. Symmetry, 14(12), 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122655.
T. Karamat, K. Ullah, D. Pamucar, and M. Akram, “Applications Aczel-Alsina t-norm and t-conorm for the assessment of fire extinguishers using Pythagorean fuzzy information,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol.
Karamat, T., Ullah, K., Pamucar, D., & Akram, M. (2023). Applications Aczel-Alsina t-norm and t-conorm for the assessment of fire extinguishers using Pythagorean fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45(4), 5325-5351. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-231876.
Zhang, Z. (2017). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Frank aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 28, 1471-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2143-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
